Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Time limits apply, so get a free case review from Cross & York today.

Start your claim

Train Accident Claims

United States (federal and general)Last reviewed 18 September 2026

Train accident claims depend on who was hurt: passengers and members of the public claim under state negligence law, while railroad employees claim under the federal FELA statute instead of workers' compensation. Federal law also caps total damages from a single passenger rail accident.

Passengers and Crossing Accidents

Passengers may claim against the railroad, and where the cause is a defect, against equipment makers or maintenance contractors. Grade-crossing collisions can involve the railroad, the road authority responsible for the crossing signals and sight lines, and the motorist.

The Federal Cap on Passenger Rail Liability

Direct Answer: Under 49 U.S.C. § 28103, total damages, including punitive damages, recoverable by all passengers from all defendants for a single rail passenger accident are capped at $200 million, adjusted upward for inflation every five years.

The cap applies to the aggregate of all claims from one accident, so it matters only in the largest disasters, but it can limit recovery when many people are injured.

Railroad Workers and FELA

Railroad employees injured on the job claim under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, a fault-based federal statute that lets them sue their employer for negligence rather than receiving no-fault workers' compensation. It does not apply to passengers or the public.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue Amtrak after a train accident?

Yes, passengers and others injured through Amtrak's negligence can claim, but federal law caps total damages for all passengers from one accident. The base cap is $200 million, adjusted upward for inflation.

What law covers railroad employees?

The Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) instead of state workers' compensation. Claims are fault-based and heard in state or federal court.

Who is responsible in a train-vs-car crossing collision?

It depends on the facts: the motorist, the railroad if signals or warnings failed or it was going too fast, and the road authority for crossing design. Fault may be shared.

What if a commuter train is government-run?

A short notice-of-claim deadline may apply, and damages may be limited by state law. Contact an attorney as soon as possible.

What evidence is preserved after a train accident?

Locomotive event recorders, cameras, signal and dispatch data and maintenance records. An early request that the railroad preserve them is standard practice.

Can I get a train accident lawyer without paying upfront?

Usually, yes. Most personal injury attorneys work on a contingency fee: they are paid a percentage of the recovery only if the case succeeds, and the percentage, and whether it is calculated before or after case costs, is set out in a written agreement. Ask which order applies before you sign, because it changes your net recovery.

You May Also Be Interested In

More guides on this topic

Slip and Fall Accident Claims

A slip and fall claim is a premises liability claim: you must show the property owner knew, or reasonably should have known, about a dangerous cond…

Read more

Premises Liability Claims

Premises liability law makes property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries caused by unsafe conditions they knew about, or should have kno…

Read more

Pedestrian Accident Claims in the US

A pedestrian struck by a vehicle can claim against the driver's insurer if the driver was negligent.

Read more

Bicycle Accident Claims

A cyclist injured by a negligent driver can claim in the same way as any other motorist or pedestrian accident victim.

Read more

Hit and Run Accident Claims

If a driver flees, you may still be compensated through the uninsured motorist coverage on your own auto policy, or the policy of a household member.

Read more

Rear-End Collision Claims

In most rear-end collisions the driver in the back is presumed or found to be at fault for following too closely or not paying attention, but the p…

Read more

Drunk Driving Accident Claims

A civil claim for a drunk-driving crash is separate from the criminal DUI case.

Read more

Boating Accident Claims

Boating accidents on navigable waters can fall under federal maritime law, which generally gives three years to sue for personal injury.

Read more

Swimming Pool Accident Claims

Pool owners and operators can be liable for drownings, entrapment and other injuries caused by unsafe conditions.

Read more

Burn Injury Claims

Burn injury claims arise from fires, explosions, scalding, chemical and electrical incidents, and the liable party may be a property owner, employe…

Read more

Traumatic Brain Injury Claims

A traumatic brain injury (TBI) claim can recover far more than the initial hospital bills because the effects can be lifelong.

Read more

Spinal Cord Injury Claims

A spinal cord injury claim is valued mainly by what the person will need for the rest of their life: medical care, attendant care, equipment, home…

Read more

Amputation Injury Claims

An amputation claim must account for the lifetime cost of prosthetics, which need replacing repeatedly, plus rehabilitation, modifications, lost ea…

Read more

Where this applies: Contingency fee rules are set state by state. Check your own state's rules before acting.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 18 September 2026.

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5 (Fees)

    Model, not law. Each state adopts its own version. Rule 1.5(d) bars contingency fees in most domestic relations matters and in criminal defence.

  2. Cornell LII — contingency fee
  3. 49 U.S.C. § 28103 (limitations on rail passenger transportation liability)

    Caps the total damages, including punitive, that all passengers can recover from all defendants for a single rail passenger accident at $200 million, adjusted for inflation every five years — so the current cap is higher than the statutory base figure.

  4. Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51

    Railroad employees injured at work claim under FELA (a fault-based federal statute), not state workers' compensation. It does not govern claims by passengers or the public.

  5. Cornell LII Wex — Common carrier

    Buses, trains and similar public transport operators are commonly held to a heightened duty of care toward passengers; the precise standard is set by each state.

  6. Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2 (claim against a public entity — six months)

    A claim for death or personal injury against a California public entity must be presented within six months of accrual — separate from, and much shorter than, the two-year general limitation in CCP § 335.1.

  7. N.Y. General Municipal Law § 50-e (notice of claim — ninety days)

    A notice of claim against a New York public corporation is due within 90 days of the claim arising — far shorter than CPLR § 214's three-year general limitation. § 50-i then gives one year and 90 days from accrual to actually commence the lawsuit.

  8. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.101 (Tort Claims Act notice — six months)

    Default notice to a Texas governmental unit is due within six months of the incident, but a city or other local unit may set its own notice period by charter or ordinance — no shorter than 30 days. Always check the specific city's charter, not just the state default.

  9. Fla. Stat. § 768.28 (sovereign immunity — presentment of claims)

    A claim against a Florida state agency or subdivision must be presented in writing within three years — the same period as the general negligence limitation, not shorter. But suit cannot be filed until the agency denies the claim or 180 days pass, whichever is first — a waiting requirement, not a shorter deadline.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 18 September 2026. Next review due 18 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Find out for free.

Reading the rules is the first step. Most claims have strict deadlines, and evidence is easier to gather the sooner you act. Tell Cross & York what happened and get a free, no-obligation review of your situation.

  • Free, no-obligation case review: you decide what happens next
  • Fees for injury cases are commonly contingent, so you pay nothing upfront if the firm accepts your case
  • Takes about two minutes, and you can start with just the basics

Where this applies: Contingency fee rules are set state by state. Check your own state's rules before acting.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5 (Fees)

    Model, not law. Each state adopts its own version. Rule 1.5(d) bars contingency fees in most domestic relations matters and in criminal defence.

  2. Cornell LII — contingency fee
  3. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) (costs to the prevailing party)

    A losing plaintiff may be ordered to pay the defendant's taxable costs. There is no US equivalent of QOCS.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.