Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Slip, Trip and Fall Claims

England & WalesLast reviewed 17 September 2026

A slip, trip or fall claim turns on whether the occupier of the premises breached their legal duty of care — not simply on whether you fell. The relevant law depends on whether you were a lawful visitor or a trespasser at the time.

What Do You Need to Show?

Direct Answer: Under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957, an occupier owes lawful visitors a duty to take reasonable care to keep them reasonably safe for the purpose they were invited or permitted to be there. A claim succeeds by showing that duty was breached — a known or reasonably discoverable hazard that wasn't fixed or warned about within a reasonable time — not simply that an accident happened.

This matters because occupiers are not insurers of every visitor's safety. A freshly spilled drink that nobody has had a realistic chance to notice or clean up is a different case from a spillage left for an hour with no warning sign, or a broken paving slab the local authority has been told about repeatedly and done nothing about. The law is looking at what the occupier knew or ought to have known, and whether their response was reasonable.

A different, narrower duty applies if you were a trespasser rather than a lawful visitor. Under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984, the occupier must not act with reckless disregard for a danger they know or believe exists and know or believe a trespasser might encounter — a materially higher bar for a claimant to clear than the 1957 Act's duty to lawful visitors.

Common Settings

  • Shops and supermarkets — spillages, trailing cables, obstructed aisles, uneven flooring
  • Council-maintained land — broken pavements, potholes, poorly lit public walkways
  • Workplaces — often overlaps with an employers' liability claim if the hazard was created by your employer's own failure
  • Private premises and events — the occupier's duty applies whether the premises are commercial or residential

Building Your Evidence

Photograph the hazard as soon as possible — floors get remopped and defects get repaired quickly once an accident is reported, and the evidence can disappear within hours. Note the exact time and location, ask whether CCTV covers the area, get contact details for anyone who saw it happen, and report the accident formally (an accident book entry, or a report to the council) so there's a contemporaneous record independent of your own account.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim if I tripped on a pavement?

Potentially, against the local authority responsible for maintaining it, if the defect was dangerous enough and they knew or should have known about it and failed to act within a reasonable time. A trivial, barely-there unevenness usually won't succeed — councils are not expected to keep every surface perfectly flat.

Who is liable if I slip in a shop or supermarket?

The occupier — usually the business operating the premises — owes lawful visitors a 'common duty of care' under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 to take reasonable care to keep them reasonably safe. A wet floor with no warning sign, or a spillage left unattended for an unreasonable time, is the kind of thing this duty is meant to catch.

What if I was somewhere I wasn't supposed to be?

A different, narrower duty applies to trespassers under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 — the occupier must not act with reckless disregard for a known danger they're aware trespassers might encounter. It's a lower bar to clear than the 1957 Act's duty to lawful visitors, and many trespasser claims fail.

How long do I have to make a slip or trip claim?

Generally 3 years from the date of the accident, the same limitation period as other personal injury claims in England and Wales. Councils and large organisations may take longer to respond, so it's worth starting well before the deadline.

Do I need photos or evidence?

It helps enormously. Photos of the hazard taken as soon as possible (before it's fixed or a floor is remopped), the date and time, any CCTV that might exist, and details of anyone who saw what happened all make it much easier to show the occupier fell short of their duty — as opposed to an accident nobody could reasonably have prevented.

Will I have to show the occupier was negligent, or is it automatic?

You have to show negligence — that the occupier failed to take reasonable care, not just that you fell. An occupier isn't liable for every accident on their premises, only ones caused by a failure to keep the premises reasonably safe for the use a visitor was invited to make of them.

You May Also Be Interested In

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 17 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  4. Occupiers' Liability Act 1957

    The 'common duty of care' an occupier owes to lawful visitors — the basis of most slip, trip, shop and public-place accident claims.

  5. Occupiers' Liability Act 1984

    A narrower duty owed to trespassers and others without permission to be on the premises — distinct from the 1957 Act's duty to lawful visitors.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 17 September 2026. Next review due 17 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.