Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Supermarket & Shop Accident Claims

England & WalesLast reviewed 17 September 2026

A supermarket or shop owes every customer a duty to take reasonable care to keep the premises safe. A claim turns on whether that duty was breached — a hazard the store knew about, or should have, and failed to deal with in reasonable time.

What You Need to Show

Direct Answer: Under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957, a shop or supermarket must take reasonable care to keep customers reasonably safe. A claim succeeds by showing the store fell short of that — a spillage left too long, a known hazard that wasn't addressed, or unsafely stacked stock — not simply by showing an accident happened on their premises.

A wet floor sign is common evidence in these cases, but it isn't an automatic defence for the store, and nor does its absence automatically mean the store is liable. What matters is whether the store's overall response to the hazard — how quickly it was identified, how it was managed in the meantime, and whether the warning (if any) was adequate — was reasonable in the circumstances.

A different but related scenario is stock falling from a shelf or display. Here the question is whether the way goods were stacked or displayed created an unreasonable risk — overloaded shelving, items placed precariously, or a known fault with fixtures that should have been repaired.

Evidence That Actually Helps

Report the accident before you leave, if you can — most stores keep an accident book, and a contemporaneous entry is far stronger evidence than a recollection given weeks later. Photograph the hazard itself as soon as possible, since a spillage gets mopped up and a shelf gets restocked within minutes of an incident being reported. Ask whether CCTV covers the area, and get contact details for anyone who witnessed what happened.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim if I slipped on a wet supermarket floor?

Potentially, if the store failed to take reasonable care to keep the floor safe — for example, leaving a spillage unattended for an unreasonable time with no warning sign or cordon, rather than responding to it promptly. A spillage that hadn't had any realistic chance to be noticed and cleaned up is a harder case, since the store isn't expected to guarantee a perfectly dry floor at every moment.

What if there was a wet floor warning sign out?

A warning sign doesn't automatically defeat a claim, but it does count in the store's favour as evidence they were taking reasonable steps. Whether it was sufficient depends on things like where it was placed, whether it was clearly visible, and whether the hazard itself was still reasonably manageable despite the warning.

Can I claim for a shelf or product falling on me?

Yes, if the way goods were stacked or displayed created an unreasonable risk — overloaded or unstable shelving, items stacked precariously, or a known defect in shelving or fixtures that wasn't addressed.

Does it matter that I didn't report the accident at the time?

It doesn't automatically end a claim, but reporting it promptly and getting it logged in the store's accident book makes a real difference to how easily you can later prove what happened, when, and how the store responded. Report it before you leave if you possibly can.

What if the store says they have CCTV showing something different from what I remember?

This is exactly why prompt evidence-gathering matters — your own photos, witness details, and an immediate accident report give you an independent record to weigh against the store's account, rather than relying solely on memory once time has passed.

How long do I have to make a supermarket or shop accident claim?

Generally 3 years from the date of the accident, the standard limitation period for personal injury claims in England and Wales.

You May Also Be Interested In

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 17 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  4. Occupiers' Liability Act 1957

    The 'common duty of care' an occupier owes to lawful visitors — the basis of most slip, trip, shop and public-place accident claims.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 17 September 2026. Next review due 17 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.