Care Home Accident Claims
A care home owes its residents a duty to take reasonable care for their safety. A fall or physical accident can support a claim where the home's supervision, premises, or equipment fell below that standard given the resident's known needs.
What You Need to Show
Direct Answer: A care home owes residents a duty to take reasonable care for their safety, informed by what the home knows about each resident's specific needs. A claim succeeds by showing the home fell below that standard — inadequate supervision of a known falls risk, an unaddressed hazard, or unsafely maintained equipment such as a bed rail or hoist — not simply by showing an accident happened.
This is why a resident's known risk factors matter so much to these claims. A home that knows a resident has a history of falls, mobility problems, or cognitive impairment affecting their awareness of hazards is expected to put in place precautions proportionate to that known risk — a general duty of care applied to someone with no particular risk factors looks different from the same duty applied to someone the home already knew needed closer attention.
CQC registration and inspection reports can be useful supporting evidence. A poor inspection history on a directly relevant issue — falls prevention, staffing levels, equipment maintenance — can help show a pattern rather than an isolated, unforeseeable incident, though it doesn't by itself prove a civil claim on its own.
Accident, Neglect, or Clinical Negligence?
This guide covers physical accidents — falls, equipment failures, and injuries caused by unsafe premises or inadequate supervision. Deliberate mistreatment or a wider pattern of neglect is a related but different category; see our abuse claims guide if that better fits what happened. An injury that stems from poor medical or nursing management — a pressure sore, a medication error — can instead be a clinical negligence matter. These categories can overlap, so it's worth discussing the full picture with a solicitor rather than assuming only one applies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I claim if a relative fell in a care home?
What's the difference between this and an abuse claim?
What if the injury was actually caused by poor medical or nursing care, like a pressure sore?
Does it matter that the care home is regulated by the CQC?
Can I claim on behalf of a relative who has since died?
How long do I have to make a care home accident claim?
You May Also Be Interested In
Personal Injury
The full personal injury claims overview
Read moreAbuse Claims
Deliberate mistreatment and neglect
Read moreMedical Negligence
Claims for substandard clinical care
Read moreSlip, Trip & Fall Claims
Occupiers' liability claims generally
Read moreFatal Accidents
Claims following a death caused by negligence
Read moreWhere this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.
Sources for this page
Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 17 September 2026.
- Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)
The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.
- Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013
Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.
- Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)
Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.
- Occupiers' Liability Act 1957
The 'common duty of care' an occupier owes to lawful visitors — the basis of most slip, trip, shop and public-place accident claims.
Who wrote and checked this page
- Written and published by
- Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
- Legal review
- Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors — Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
- Review dates
- Last reviewed 17 September 2026. Next review due 17 March 2027.
Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.