Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Care Home Accident Claims

England & WalesLast reviewed 17 September 2026

A care home owes its residents a duty to take reasonable care for their safety. A fall or physical accident can support a claim where the home's supervision, premises, or equipment fell below that standard given the resident's known needs.

What You Need to Show

Direct Answer: A care home owes residents a duty to take reasonable care for their safety, informed by what the home knows about each resident's specific needs. A claim succeeds by showing the home fell below that standard — inadequate supervision of a known falls risk, an unaddressed hazard, or unsafely maintained equipment such as a bed rail or hoist — not simply by showing an accident happened.

This is why a resident's known risk factors matter so much to these claims. A home that knows a resident has a history of falls, mobility problems, or cognitive impairment affecting their awareness of hazards is expected to put in place precautions proportionate to that known risk — a general duty of care applied to someone with no particular risk factors looks different from the same duty applied to someone the home already knew needed closer attention.

CQC registration and inspection reports can be useful supporting evidence. A poor inspection history on a directly relevant issue — falls prevention, staffing levels, equipment maintenance — can help show a pattern rather than an isolated, unforeseeable incident, though it doesn't by itself prove a civil claim on its own.

Accident, Neglect, or Clinical Negligence?

This guide covers physical accidents — falls, equipment failures, and injuries caused by unsafe premises or inadequate supervision. Deliberate mistreatment or a wider pattern of neglect is a related but different category; see our abuse claims guide if that better fits what happened. An injury that stems from poor medical or nursing management — a pressure sore, a medication error — can instead be a clinical negligence matter. These categories can overlap, so it's worth discussing the full picture with a solicitor rather than assuming only one applies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim if a relative fell in a care home?

Potentially, if the fall was caused by the home failing to take reasonable care — for example, inadequate supervision of someone with a known falls risk, a poorly maintained hazard such as a wet floor or broken equipment, or an unsafely fitted bed rail or hoist. A fall doesn't automatically mean the home was negligent; it needs to be shown they fell below a reasonable standard of care given the resident's known needs.

What's the difference between this and an abuse claim?

This page covers physical accidents — falls, equipment failures, injuries from unsafe premises or inadequate supervision. Deliberate mistreatment or a broader pattern of neglect is a different, related category with its own considerations. See our separate guide on abuse claims if that better describes what happened.

What if the injury was actually caused by poor medical or nursing care, like a pressure sore?

That can shade into clinical or nursing negligence rather than a straightforward accident claim, particularly for pressure sores, medication errors, or failures in ongoing medical management. It's worth discussing the specific facts with a solicitor to identify which type of claim — or combination — actually fits.

Does it matter that the care home is regulated by the CQC?

CQC registration and inspection reports can be useful supporting evidence — a home with a poor inspection history on a relevant issue (falls prevention, staffing levels) can help show a pattern rather than a one-off, isolated incident. Regulatory failings don't by themselves prove a civil claim, but they're a useful part of the picture.

Can I claim on behalf of a relative who has since died?

Yes, in principle — a claim that existed at the time of death can generally continue for the benefit of the estate, and in some circumstances a separate claim may arise under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 if the death itself was caused by the negligence. This is a genuinely fact-specific area, so early advice matters.

How long do I have to make a care home accident claim?

Generally 3 years from the date of the accident or date of knowledge, the standard personal injury limitation period, though this can be affected by the injured person's mental capacity to bring a claim themselves.

You May Also Be Interested In

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 17 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  4. Occupiers' Liability Act 1957

    The 'common duty of care' an occupier owes to lawful visitors — the basis of most slip, trip, shop and public-place accident claims.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 17 September 2026. Next review due 17 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.