Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Time limits apply, so get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors today.

Start your claim

Product Liability No Win No Fee — England & Wales

England & WalesLast reviewed 18 September 2026

Product liability claims in the UK are governed by the Consumer Protection Act 1987, which imposes strict liability on producers of defective products. You do not need to prove negligence — only that the product was defective and caused your injury.

Who You Can Sue for a Defective Product

Direct Answer: Under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 you can claim against the producer of the product, anyone who put their own name or mark on it so as to hold themselves out as the producer, an importer who brought it into the UK, and — where those cannot be identified — the supplier who fails to name them on request. You do not have to prove negligence.

That last route matters in practice. If you bought a product from a retailer and nobody can identify who made it, the retailer can become liable itself by failing to identify the producer when asked. Keep the packaging, the receipt and the product.

A product liability claim can also run alongside a contract claim against the retailer under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, and a negligence claim at common law. Which route is best depends on who you bought from, what went wrong and what you lost — the three are not alternatives you must choose between at the outset.

How Does Strict Liability Work Under the CPA 1987?

Direct Answer: The Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on manufacturers — you don't need to prove negligence, only that the product was defective and caused your injury. Claims can be brought on a no win no fee CFA. There is a 3-year limitation and a 10-year longstop from product supply.

The Consumer Protection Act 1987 implemented the EU Product Liability Directive (85/374/EEC) into UK law. It imposes liability on producers without the need to prove negligence. The claimant must establish three elements: the product was defective, they suffered damage (death, personal injury, or property damage exceeding £275), and the defect caused the damage.

The Development Risk Defence

The CPA provides a "development risk" or "state of the art" defence: a producer is not liable if they can show that the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the time the product was supplied was not such that a producer of products of that description might be expected to have discovered the defect. This defence is narrowly construed.

Common Product Liability Claims

  • Defective vehicles and vehicle components
  • Faulty electrical appliances causing fire or injury
  • Defective medical devices and implants
  • Contaminated or allergenic food products
  • Dangerous children's toys
  • Defective pharmaceuticals

Consumer Rights Act 2015

In addition to claims under the CPA 1987, consumers have rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 against the seller (retailer). Goods must be of satisfactory quality, fit for a particular purpose, and as described. If goods are faulty, the consumer may be entitled to a repair, replacement, or refund.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim for a defective product on no win no fee?

Yes. Product liability claims can be handled on a CFA (no win no fee) basis. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 provides a strict liability regime, meaning you do not need to prove the manufacturer was negligent — only that the product was defective and caused your injury.

What is strict liability under the Consumer Protection Act 1987?

The CPA 1987 (implementing the EU Product Liability Directive 85/374/EEC) imposes strict liability on producers of defective products. The claimant must prove that the product was defective, they suffered damage, and the defect caused the damage. They do not need to prove that the producer was negligent.

What counts as a 'defect'?

A product is defective under the CPA if its safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect, taking into account all the circumstances including the manner in which the product has been marketed, instructions and warnings, and what might reasonably be expected to be done with it.

Who can be sued in a product liability claim?

Claims can be brought against the producer (manufacturer), any person who holds themselves out as the producer (own-branders), importers into the UK, and suppliers who fail to identify the producer when asked. Retailers may be liable under the Sale of Goods Act / Consumer Rights Act 2015.

What is the limitation period?

Claims under the CPA 1987 must be brought within 3 years of the date of injury or date of knowledge. There is also a longstop limitation of 10 years from the date the product was first supplied (after which no claim can be brought regardless of when the injury occurred).

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 18 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors — Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 18 September 2026. Next review due 18 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Find out for free.

Reading the rules is the first step. Most claims have strict deadlines, and evidence is easier to gather the sooner you act. Tell Edward & Amaury Solicitors what happened and get a free, no-obligation review of your situation.

  • Free, no-obligation case review: you decide what happens next
  • Many claims are handled on a no win, no fee basis if the firm accepts your case
  • Takes about two minutes, and you can start with just the basics

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.