Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Pedestrian Accident Claims

England & WalesLast reviewed 17 September 2026

A pedestrian hit by a negligent driver can bring a personal injury claim against that driver's motor insurer. Being partly at fault doesn't necessarily bar a claim — it can reduce the compensation instead.

What If You Were Partly to Blame?

Direct Answer: Being partly responsible for a pedestrian accident — crossing away from a designated crossing, for example — doesn't usually stop you claiming altogether. A court apportions responsibility between the parties and reduces your compensation to reflect your own share of the blame, a doctrine called contributory negligence.

Highway Code Rule H1, in force since 29 January 2022, sets out a hierarchy of road users: those who can do the greatest harm to others bear the greatest responsibility to reduce the danger they pose, with pedestrians among those most protected by that principle. Under Road Traffic Act 1988 s.38(7), a breach of the Highway Code isn't itself a civil wrong, but it's evidence a court can weigh when deciding whether a driver's conduct fell below what was reasonable.

In practice this means a driver who fails to slow down near a pedestrian crossing or stepping out from between parked cars, or who is speeding, distracted or fails to anticipate a pedestrian's movements, can still be found substantially or wholly at fault even where the pedestrian's own positioning wasn't perfect.

Uninsured and Untraced Drivers

If the driver had no insurance, or failed to stop and can't be identified, a claim may still be possible through the Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB) — an industry-funded body that exists specifically to compensate victims in these situations. MIB claims follow their own procedure and can carry stricter notification deadlines than the general limitation period, so early advice matters.

What Compensation Covers

General damages compensate the pain, suffering and loss of amenity caused by your injury. Special damages cover your actual financial losses — lost earnings, medical and rehabilitation costs, care needs while you recover, and damaged personal property such as clothing, a phone, or glasses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I still claim if I was partly to blame, like crossing away from a crossing?

Possibly, but your compensation may be reduced for contributory negligence in proportion to your share of the blame. Crossing away from a designated crossing isn't itself unlawful and doesn't bar a claim outright, but a court will weigh it against the driver's own conduct when apportioning responsibility.

Does the Highway Code's hierarchy of road users help pedestrians?

Yes, in principle. Rule H1, in force since January 2022, states that road users who can do the greatest harm — drivers — bear the greatest responsibility to reduce danger to those most at risk, and pedestrians sit at the top of that hierarchy of protection. It doesn't change the basic negligence test, but it's a factor a court can weigh when assessing a driver's conduct toward a pedestrian.

What if the driver who hit me was uninsured or drove off?

You may still be able to claim through the Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB), which compensates victims of uninsured and untraced drivers. MIB claims have their own procedure and can carry stricter time limits than the general 3-year limitation period.

Can I claim if I was hit on a pavement or pedestrian area, not a road?

Yes — a vehicle that mounts a pavement or is driven negligently in a pedestrianised area doesn't stop being subject to ordinary negligence principles just because it's off the carriageway.

What compensation can a pedestrian accident claim cover?

General damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, plus special damages for financial losses — lost earnings, medical and rehabilitation costs, care costs, and damaged property such as clothing or a phone, calculated to reflect your actual losses.

How long do I have to claim?

Generally 3 years from the date of the accident, the standard limitation period for personal injury claims in England and Wales. Different, often stricter, notification deadlines can apply to MIB claims specifically.

You May Also Be Interested In

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 17 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  4. The Highway Code — Rule H1 (hierarchy of road users) · in force from 29 January 2022

    Places greater responsibility for reducing danger on those who can do the greatest harm (e.g. drivers) toward those most at risk (pedestrians, cyclists). A Code breach is not itself a civil wrong but is admissible as evidence of negligence under Road Traffic Act 1988 s.38(7).

  5. Road Traffic Act 1988, s.38(7)

    A failure to observe the Highway Code does not itself make a person liable, but may be relied on in any proceedings as tending to establish or negate liability.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 17 September 2026. Next review due 17 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors.

Start your claim

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.