Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Time limits apply, so get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors today.

Start your claim

Needlestick Injury Claims

England & WalesLast reviewed 18 September 2026

A needlestick or sharps injury at work can support a claim if your employer failed to provide safer sharps, training or safe disposal, and you were harmed. Even where no infection results, the physical injury and the psychological distress of waiting for results can be compensated.

What Employers Must Do

Direct Answer: In healthcare, employers must use safer sharps where reasonably practicable, avoid unnecessary needles, provide training, and have safe disposal and post-incident procedures under the 2013 Sharp Instruments Regulations.

Claims commonly allege that safer needles were not provided, that sharps bins were overfilled or badly placed, that staff were not trained, or that staffing pressure led to unsafe practice. Outside healthcare, cleaners, waste workers and police officers can suffer sharps injuries where discarded needles were not safely managed.

Compensation Where No Infection Results

Even if you do not contract an infection, the puncture injury itself and the anxiety while waiting for test results, which may span months, are recognised and can be compensated, with medical or psychological evidence about the effects. If an infection such as hepatitis or HIV is contracted, the claim is far larger and involves lifelong losses.

Immediate Steps

Follow the post-exposure procedure, attend occupational health and get blood tests as advised. Report the injury and make sure it is recorded, and note the equipment and circumstances.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim for a needlestick injury with no infection?

Potentially, yes. You may recover for the injury and the psychological effects while waiting for test results, provided your employer's negligence caused the incident and you have medical evidence.

Who can claim?

Anyone injured because a sharps hazard was not properly managed, most often healthcare workers but also cleaners, waste and refuse staff, and emergency service workers.

What should I do straight after the injury?

Follow your employer's exposure procedure, seek urgent occupational health advice, have blood tests and report and record the incident.

What if the needle wasn't in a healthcare setting?

A claim can still lie against an employer or occupier who failed to manage the risk, for example by leaving sharps in waste that staff were expected to handle without proper protection.

Do I have to prove my employer was negligent?

Yes. Since 1 October 2013 a breach of a health and safety regulation does not by itself give you a civil claim. You must show your employer failed to take reasonable care, though a breach of the relevant regulations is strong evidence that they did.

How long do I have to bring a needlestick injury claim?

Generally three years from the date of the accident or, for an injury or illness that developed gradually, from your date of knowledge that it was significant and work-related. Different rules apply to children and people who lack capacity.

Can I make a workplace injury claim on a no win no fee basis?

Usually, yes. Most solicitors handle accident at work claims under a Conditional Fee Agreement, so you pay no solicitor fees if the claim fails, and QOCS normally protects you from the other side's costs. If it succeeds, a success fee capped at 25% of general damages and past losses is deducted from your damages.

You May Also Be Interested In

More guides on this topic

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 18 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  4. Limitation Act 1980, s.11 (personal injury actions)

    Three years from the date of the accident or the date of knowledge. Property damage such as a damaged vehicle is a separate claim with a longer six-year period under s.2.

  5. Limitation Act 1980, s.14 (date of knowledge)

    The three-year period can run from the 'date of knowledge': when you first knew the injury was significant and attributable to the act or omission alleged to be negligent. Central in delayed-diagnosis cases.

  6. Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/645)

    Healthcare employers must use safer sharps where reasonably practicable and provide training, post-incident action and safe disposal.

  7. Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, s.69 (civil liability for breach of health and safety duties)

    For accidents from 1 October 2013, breach of a health and safety regulation does not by itself give a civil claim unless the regulation says so. A workplace injury claim must generally prove negligence, using the regulations as evidence of the standard of care.

  8. Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969

    Most employers must hold employers' liability insurance covering injury or disease to employees, so that a successful claimant can be paid.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 18 September 2026. Next review due 18 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Find out for free.

Reading the rules is the first step. Most claims have strict deadlines, and evidence is easier to gather the sooner you act. Tell Edward & Amaury Solicitors what happened and get a free, no-obligation review of your situation.

  • Free, no-obligation case review: you decide what happens next
  • Many claims are handled on a no win, no fee basis if the firm accepts your case
  • Takes about two minutes, and you can start with just the basics

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.