Manual Handling Injury Claims
Employers must avoid hazardous manual handling where reasonably practicable, and where it is unavoidable, assess the risk and reduce it. A back, shoulder or joint injury from lifting, pushing or carrying at work may support a claim if your employer failed to do so.
Avoid, Assess, Reduce
Direct Answer: The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 require employers to avoid hazardous manual handling where reasonably practicable, assess the risk of unavoidable tasks and reduce it, for example through mechanical aids, redesigning the task or training.
Claims commonly allege there was no risk assessment, no lifting equipment, inadequate staffing for two-person lifts, or no training in safe handling. Care workers moving patients, warehouse and delivery staff, and construction and manufacturing workers are frequently affected.
Sudden and Gradual Injuries
A single lift can cause an acute injury such as a slipped disc, but many manual handling injuries develop over time from repeated lifting. For gradual injuries the limitation period can run from your date of knowledge that the condition was significant and work-related, and expert medical evidence is needed on causation.
Your Own Part
Employees must follow training and use equipment provided. An employer will argue contributory negligence if you ignored safe systems, but they cannot rely on that if they never provided training or equipment in the first place.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I claim for a back injury from lifting at work?
Does the weight of the load matter?
What if my injury built up over months?
What if I was never trained?
Do I have to prove my employer was negligent?
How long do I have to bring a manual handling claim?
Can I make a workplace injury claim on a no win no fee basis?
You May Also Be Interested In
Employers' Liability
Workplace injury claims and your rights
Read moreAccident at Work Claims
What to do and how to claim after a workplace accident
Read moreFaulty Equipment Claims at Work
Injuries from defective work equipment
Read moreIndustrial Disease
Claims for gradual work-related illness
Read moreWhat Is No Win No Fee?
How CFAs work in England and Wales
Read moreMore guides on this topic
Work-Related Stress Claims
A work stress claim needs a recognised psychiatric illness, not just unhappiness, caused by your employer's breach of duty.
Read moreConstruction Accident Claims
Construction site accidents can involve several responsible parties: your employer, the principal contractor, the client or another trade.
Read moreNeedlestick Injury Claims
A needlestick or sharps injury at work can support a claim if your employer failed to provide safer sharps, training or safe disposal, and you were…
Read moreWork Injury Claims When Your Employer Has No Insurance
Most employers must hold employers' liability insurance.
Read moreAgency Worker and Self-Employed Accident Claims
Agency workers, contractors and gig workers can still claim for a work injury, but the right defendant differs.
Read moreWhere this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.
Sources for this page
Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 18 September 2026.
- Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)
The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.
- Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013
Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.
- Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)
Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.
- Limitation Act 1980, s.11 (personal injury actions)
Three years from the date of the accident or the date of knowledge. Property damage such as a damaged vehicle is a separate claim with a longer six-year period under s.2.
- Limitation Act 1980, s.14 (date of knowledge)
The three-year period can run from the 'date of knowledge': when you first knew the injury was significant and attributable to the act or omission alleged to be negligent. Central in delayed-diagnosis cases.
- Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/2793)
Employers must avoid hazardous manual handling so far as reasonably practicable, assess unavoidable risks and reduce them.
- Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, s.69 (civil liability for breach of health and safety duties)
For accidents from 1 October 2013, breach of a health and safety regulation does not by itself give a civil claim unless the regulation says so. A workplace injury claim must generally prove negligence, using the regulations as evidence of the standard of care.
- Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969
Most employers must hold employers' liability insurance covering injury or disease to employees, so that a successful claimant can be paid.
Who wrote and checked this page
- Written and published by
- Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
- Legal review
- Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors — Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
- Review dates
- Last reviewed 18 September 2026. Next review due 18 March 2027.
Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.