Dog Bite & Animal Attack Claims
Dog bite and animal attack claims can rely on strict liability under the Animals Act 1971, which in some circumstances means you don't need to prove the owner was careless — only that the statutory conditions for liability are met.
Strict Liability Under the Animals Act 1971
Direct Answer: Section 2 of the Animals Act 1971 can make an animal's keeper liable for damage it causes without the claimant needing to prove the keeper was negligent — a genuinely different, and in some ways easier, route than an ordinary personal injury claim, provided the statutory conditions are satisfied.
For an animal that isn't a "dangerous species" — which covers ordinary domestic dogs — a three-part test applies. The claimant must show: the damage was of a kind the animal was likely to cause, or which, if caused, was likely to be severe; that likelihood was due to characteristics not normally found in animals of that species (or not normally found except at particular times or in particular circumstances); and the keeper knew of those characteristics. This test was considered by the House of Lords in Mirvahedy v Henley [2003] UKHL 16, which confirmed it can be satisfied by characteristics that are normal for the species in particular circumstances, not only genuinely abnormal ones.
Whether a specific incident meets this test is a fact-specific question — a dog with a known history of aggression is a much clearer case than a first, unexplained incident with no prior warning signs. This is exactly the kind of assessment a solicitor experienced in animal attack claims can help evaluate before you decide how to proceed.
When You're on Someone Else's Property
If you were attacked while lawfully on the keeper's property, an Animals Act claim can run alongside an ordinary occupiers' liability claim under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957, depending on the circumstances. A solicitor will typically consider both routes rather than relying on only one.
What Compensation Covers
A dog bite or animal attack claim covers general damages for pain, suffering and any resulting scarring or disfigurement, and special damages for your financial losses — medical treatment including any plastic surgery, psychological support if the attack leaves you with a lasting fear of animals, lost earnings, and damaged clothing or property.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to prove the owner was negligent to claim for a dog bite?
Does it matter what breed the dog is?
Can I claim if I was bitten by someone else's dog while visiting their home?
What if the dog that bit me was a stray, or the owner can't be identified?
What compensation can a dog bite claim cover?
How long do I have to make a dog bite claim?
You May Also Be Interested In
Personal Injury
The full personal injury claims overview
Read moreScarring & Disfigurement Claims
Compensation for scarring caused by an animal attack
Read morePTSD & Psychological Injury Claims
Claims for psychological effects of an attack
Read morePublic Liability
Broader public liability claims
Read moreSlip, Trip & Fall Claims
Claims under the Occupiers' Liability Acts
Read moreWhere this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.
Sources for this page
Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 17 September 2026.
- Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)
The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.
- Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013
Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.
- Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)
Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.
- Animals Act 1971, s.2
Strict liability for a keeper of an animal, with a different test for a 'dangerous species' versus other animals (the three-part test in s.2(2), as construed in Mirvahedy v Henley [2003] UKHL 16).
Who wrote and checked this page
- Written and published by
- Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
- Legal review
- Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors — Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
- Review dates
- Last reviewed 17 September 2026. Next review due 17 March 2027.
Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.