Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Time limits apply, so get a free case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors today.

Start your claim

Occupational Dermatitis Claims

England & WalesLast reviewed 18 September 2026

Occupational contact dermatitis is skin inflammation caused by irritants or allergens at work, such as wet work, cleaning products, cement or oils. You may have a claim if your employer failed to control exposure or provide suitable protection and you developed dermatitis.

Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis

Direct Answer: Irritant dermatitis develops from repeated damage to the skin from wet work and harsh substances, while allergic dermatitis is an immune reaction to a specific substance, often confirmed by patch testing.

Hairdressers, nurses, cleaners, caterers, mechanics, construction workers and machinists are at particular risk. Once sensitised to an allergen, even tiny exposures can trigger flare-ups, which can be career-ending.

What Employers Must Do

Under the COSHH Regulations, employers must assess skin exposure, use safer substances or methods, provide suitable and properly fitting gloves and skin care products, train workers and provide skin checks where there is a risk. HSE guidance describes good practice for preventing dermatitis.

Evidence and Compensation

Evidence includes GP and dermatology records, patch test results, photographs of flare-ups, your work history and product data sheets. Compensation reflects the severity and duration of the condition, its effect on daily life and any loss of earnings or retraining if you could not continue your job.

Frequently Asked Questions

What jobs cause occupational dermatitis?

Jobs involving wet work or contact with irritants and allergens, including hairdressing, healthcare, cleaning, catering, construction, mechanical work and manufacturing.

Can I claim if I was given gloves?

It depends on whether they were suitable, correctly fitted, available in the right size and material, and whether you were trained to use them and the rest of the controls were adequate.

What is patch testing?

A test where small amounts of possible allergens are applied to the skin to identify what you are sensitised to, which is important evidence for an allergic dermatitis claim.

Will I have to leave my job?

Sometimes, if exposure cannot be avoided once you are sensitised. Loss of earnings or retraining costs can be part of the claim.

What if my old employer no longer exists?

You may still be able to claim. Employers' liability insurance can often be traced through the Employers' Liability Tracing Office, and a dissolved company can sometimes be restored to the register so that its insurer can be pursued. Do not assume the claim is lost.

How long do I have to bring a dermatitis claim?

Generally three years from your date of knowledge: when you first knew you had a significant condition and that it might be work-related. It is not always the date of exposure, which is often decades earlier. A court has a limited discretion to allow late claims, but do not rely on it, and take advice as soon as you have a diagnosis.

Can I claim on a no win no fee basis for a work-related illness?

Usually, yes, if a solicitor thinks the claim has reasonable prospects. A Conditional Fee Agreement means you pay no solicitor fees if the claim fails, and if it succeeds a success fee capped at 25% of general damages and past losses is deducted from your damages. Disease claims need medical and occupational hygiene evidence, so ask how those costs are covered.

You May Also Be Interested In

More guides on this topic

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 18 September 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  4. Limitation Act 1980, s.11 (personal injury actions)

    Three years from the date of the accident or the date of knowledge. Property damage such as a damaged vehicle is a separate claim with a longer six-year period under s.2.

  5. Limitation Act 1980, s.14 (date of knowledge)

    The three-year period can run from the 'date of knowledge': when you first knew the injury was significant and attributable to the act or omission alleged to be negligent. Central in delayed-diagnosis cases.

  6. Limitation Act 1980, s.33 (discretionary exclusion of time limit)

    A court can allow a personal injury claim to proceed out of time where it is equitable to do so. It is a discretion, not a right, and should not be relied on.

  7. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2677)

    Employers must assess and control exposure to hazardous substances such as dusts, fumes, isocyanates and chemicals that can cause asthma, dermatitis and lung disease.

  8. HSE — Skin at work

    HSE guidance on occupational contact dermatitis and how employers should prevent it, including through COSHH controls and skin surveillance.

  9. Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969

    Most employers must hold employers' liability insurance covering injury or disease to employees, so that a successful claimant can be paid.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 18 September 2026. Next review due 18 March 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Find out for free.

Reading the rules is the first step. Most claims have strict deadlines, and evidence is easier to gather the sooner you act. Tell Edward & Amaury Solicitors what happened and get a free, no-obligation review of your situation.

  • Free, no-obligation case review: you decide what happens next
  • Many claims are handled on a no win, no fee basis if the firm accepts your case
  • Takes about two minutes, and you can start with just the basics

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.