General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Fee Disputes and Complaints

England & WalesLast reviewed 5 August 2026

If a deduction from your compensation looks wrong, ask for a written breakdown against your agreement first, then complain to the firm in writing. If that does not resolve it, or you get no response within eight weeks, the Legal Ombudsman handles service complaints — including bills you consider excessive.

Disclosure. This page is published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, itself a firm of solicitors regulated by the SRA. We are describing the complaints routes that apply to firms like ours. Everything below points to the independent bodies — the Legal Ombudsman and the SRA — rather than to us, and we have no role in and no influence over either.

Step 1 — Get the breakdown

Direct Answer: Before complaining, ask in writing for an itemised statement showing the gross damages, each deduction, and the clause in your agreement that authorises it. Most fee disputes turn out to be either a genuine error or a term that was never clearly explained — and both are easier to resolve with the figures on one page.

Check the breakdown against what your agreement actually says. In a personal injury CFA the success fee taken from damages is capped, and disbursements and any ATE premium are separate items. Our costs and deductions guide sets out what each element should be.

Step 2 — Complain to the firm

Every regulated firm must operate a complaints procedure and tell clients how to use it. Put your complaint in writing, state plainly what you say is wrong and what outcome you are seeking, and keep a copy. Ask for their final response — that phrase matters, because it starts the clock for escalation.

Step 3 — Escalate to the right body

Which body handles which complaint
BodyHandles
Legal OmbudsmanService: poor communication, delay, unclear costs information, bills you consider excessive
SRAConduct: dishonesty, misuse of client money, serious regulatory breaches
The courtDetailed assessment of a solicitor’s bill, in defined circumstances and within strict time limits
Financial Ombudsman ServiceComplaints about FCA-regulated claims management companies, not solicitors

Time limits apply at every stage and are the most common reason a valid complaint fails. Check the current limits on the Ombudsman’s own site rather than relying on a general guide, and act promptly after a final response.

Court assessment of a bill

In some circumstances a solicitor’s bill can be assessed by the court. It is a formal process with strict deadlines, and there can be costs consequences if the assessment does not reduce the bill by enough. Take independent advice from a costs specialist before starting — this is not a step to take on general information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

You May Also Be Interested In

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 5 August 2026.

  1. SRA Standards and Regulations

    Conduct rules for solicitors in England and Wales, including costs transparency.

  2. Legal Ombudsman — complaints about legal fees
  3. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
Checked for England & Wales by Edward & Amaury Solicitors Solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525) (verify on the regulator’s register).Review is recorded against the firm. The individual reviewer is not named on this page.
Review dates
Last reviewed 5 August 2026. Next review due 5 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Where this applies: This page covers England and Wales. The rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  3. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, ss.44–46 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Ended recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums from the losing party. Did not create or regulate CFAs.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.